<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter&#8217;s Most Annoying Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leveragingideas.com/2007/10/18/twitters-most-annoying-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leveragingideas.com/2007/10/18/twitters-most-annoying-feature/</link>
	<description>Ideation on economics, media, venture capital and startups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Grossberg</title>
		<link>http://www.leveragingideas.com/2007/10/18/twitters-most-annoying-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-87752</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Grossberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leveragingideas.com/2007/10/18/twitters-most-annoying-feature/#comment-87752</guid>
		<description>I agree on the RSS; disagree on the Newer/Older.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think of it as paging through results. The usual UI is to have the &quot;next&quot; page of results (in this case, older tweets) be on the right side.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Twitter&#039;s case, I think that is more relevant than the metaphor of a left-to-right chronology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yeah -- that trips me up on Twitter, del.icio.us and other sites where paging *forward* through results means going *back* in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on the RSS; disagree on the Newer/Older.</p>
<p>Think of it as paging through results. The usual UI is to have the &#8220;next&#8221; page of results (in this case, older tweets) be on the right side.</p>
<p>In Twitter&#39;s case, I think that is more relevant than the metaphor of a left-to-right chronology.</p>
<p>But yeah &#8212; that trips me up on Twitter, del.icio.us and other sites where paging *forward* through results means going *back* in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Grossberg</title>
		<link>http://www.leveragingideas.com/2007/10/18/twitters-most-annoying-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-70980</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Grossberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leveragingideas.com/2007/10/18/twitters-most-annoying-feature/#comment-70980</guid>
		<description>I agree on the RSS; disagree on the Newer/Older.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think of it as paging through results. The usual UI is to have the &quot;next&quot; page of results (in this case, older tweets) be on the right side.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Twitter&#039;s case, I think that is more relevant than the metaphor of a left-to-right chronology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yeah -- that trips me up on Twitter, del.icio.us and other sites where paging *forward* through results means going *back* in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on the RSS; disagree on the Newer/Older.</p>
<p>Think of it as paging through results. The usual UI is to have the &#8220;next&#8221; page of results (in this case, older tweets) be on the right side.</p>
<p>In Twitter&#39;s case, I think that is more relevant than the metaphor of a left-to-right chronology.</p>
<p>But yeah &#8212; that trips me up on Twitter, del.icio.us and other sites where paging *forward* through results means going *back* in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

