Dating in 2007: A Male’s Perspective (Part 1)

by Sam on November 28, 2007

Dating in 2007: A Male’s Perspective (Part 1)

One thing that has plagued me recently is the lack of anything intelligent to read by young authors speaking to situations immediately relevant to me. I would love to read a work that really speaks to my generation and to the changes in culture, media and conventions currently taking place. If I had the talent to write such a seminal work, I would. Alas I do not. Dave Eggers is probably our greatest hope. In the interim, I thought I would write a series of posts on a topic very relevant to me and to many of my friends and readers: dating in 2007.

I’m 27 and single. For the most part it sucks — I would love to be in a fulfilling relationship with a great women who I might one day marry. I know most of my friends both male and female) feel the same way. Most of my single friends (all 27-29) have exciting jobs, are extremely well educated and all decent looking.

However, like me, in the last few years they have become jaded with entire dating scene (or is it it’s own culture?). This is what I want to examine over the next few posts by sharing some insights and analysis. In particular, I hope to highlight the significant role of that technology and media are playing in modern day relationships.

Part I: Exposure and Choice

There is a tremendous book I read recently called the Paradox of Choice. In reading it my immediate reaction was that many its central tenants resonated with my experience dating. The book’s key argument is that despite all “the choiceâ€� we currently have in our lives (from salad dressing to blue jeans) overall our levels of satisfaction have actually decreased. More choice does not always lead to more satisfaction. In fact greater choice can have the opposite effect…

The most successful relationship I can think of is that of my grandparents; happily married for over 60 years. Amazingly my grandparents are likely not dissimilar from many other couples from the World War II generation. Specifically, I think my grandfather and I are great examples of how this ‘paradox of choice’ is affecting our generation, and in particular, relationships. Let me explain.

In my lifetime I have been exposed to far more people than was my grandfather by age 27 — including single women. I have moved around my entire life and lived in some of the greatest cities in this country. I go out a lot. I meet a lot of people. I have access to cars, computers, networking events, dating website, cell phones, IM, etc, etc types of connectivity and communications that did not exist in the 1940′s. To state the obvious, my exposure to people is on an order of magnitude far greater than was possible just a generation ago. I have lots of choice (or at least potential for choice).

Still, despite my grandfather’s exposure restraints (growing up in a very small New Hampshire town, being a small-town lawyer and marrying someone from a neighboring town) my grandfather has one of the greatest relationships I know of. How could it be with such limited choice my grandfather was able to find the woman of his dreams, while I have met so many more women and yet cannot find someone to date, let alone think of marrying? Among my friends, I am not an anomaly.

According to the paradox of choice, and myself, there is a combination of things occurring with greater frequency (at least within modern, affluent western culture):

1) It’s difficult to enjoy something when you know there are so many ‘other’ alternatives

2) With more choice and more sophisticated media, expectations increase dramatically

3) Trends of modern society are devaluing offline relationships


First, with so much access to such large numbers and varieties of people, it’s difficult to avoid a mindset of ‘sampling’ while always knowing there is more. For example, if I go out with someone and don’t immediately hit it off, there is likely no ‘next time’ because the mentality is that there is always someone else. The danger of this is that relationships and people need time to develop. I might easily send the women of my dreams packing simply because she had a cold and I wasn’t immediately thrilled with what appeared (falsely) to be a passive demeanor (little did I know she was sick).

Second, with greater choice and exposure we expect that we can always do better: the “grass is always greenerâ€� perspective. Growing up I was told never to settle and it’s a great mentality for business — but not for people. Without a benchmark, it’s impossible to ever not settle because, what is good enough? Also agonizing over details (or minor flaws) can take the fun out of what could be a great relationship. Thinking, “Well she is great, except for Xâ€� in a world of potentially unlimited choices, has one solution — to move on. We live in a world of consumerism where we are accustomed to researching, critiquing, waffling, and comparing as fast as possible. All good for shopping, but not necessarily good for evaluating people.

Another important point is that the benchmarks many people use are skewed with unrealistic expectations. We live in a culture of media that values the most beautiful people. I have heard a lecture on how watching porn can destroy some men’s ability to ever enjoy sex, as their expectations of how a woman should look or act become so twisted. Likewise as people enjoy greater specializations and niches (from work to activities to music…think the longtail) it becomes increasingly difficult to find that idealistic someone that you have everything in common with.

Finally, the trends of modern society devalue offline relationships. Why talk on the phone, when you can text message? Work is now 24/7. It consumes so much of our time and identity. More and more is done online. We have fewer days of vacation. Focus is on speed and efficiency, hence the rise of speed dating events. All these things take away from the art of building relationships and really getting to know people.

All of the above issues have elements that relate to my own experiences and the experiences of friends. The key is to figure out how to appropriately leverage the great exposure and access we have, but to do so in manner that values relationships and maintains realistic expectations. One obvious outgrowth for managing and sorting through such choice is with the use of technology. In the next installment I will examine the role that technology and the Internet are playing in modern dating.

  • http://www.leveragingideas.com Sam

    A Comment from Facebook, via Fa Sy:

    Interesting analysis. I like paradox of choice analogy. Is that the only explanation to non-fulfilling relationships? Probably not. But it surely has a part in it. My grandparents never met before getting married and they had a fulfilling and loving relationship their whole life. I think perspectives and expectations changed from what they were 50 years ago. Do people marry or date for the right reasons? Do they date to marry or do they date to get out of their boring routines? There are so many reasons why relationships are a headache! Can’t wait to see the technology part :) Technology killed society, the only sustainable somwwhat society we have now is the e-society and e-communities, we are all e-people living e-lives!

  • Pingback: Leveraging Ideas » Launching a Business Via Facebook Pages: New York Singles Scene: Sam Huleatt - Social Media, Venture Capital and Startup Architecture Blog

  • Will

    interesting post. I have never commented on a blog before outside of my friends’ livejournals, and I think you hit the nail on the head here. I’m 19 years old. I’m am a sociology major at USC here in Los Angeles. I’m interested in this topic in part as a result of my major, but also because dating at my school seems ridiculous. I went to an all-boys high school and it wasn’t generally hard for me to find dates on weekends. Now that I go to a college with plenty of girls, dating has become a mess.

    I don’t totally subscribe to the new choice mentality. I mean, I rarely go on trips, don’t want to live in another country, and just try to be happy with what I have and who I am. It’s not to say I’d rather be narrow, but what your grandparents have is something that tremendous. With so many people getting divorced these days, I think few may ever have it. I’d like to sometime. Good points. I hope everything works out for you.

    Thanks for letting me comment on this.

  • http://how-to-get-girlfriend.doctortomlove.com/ how to get girlfriend

    Wow what a great article. I write a How to get girlfriend blog that helps my readers get girls. But the stuff you have on here is really insightful and in fact I can relate to it quite a bit. Most of my relationships end because to quote Jerry Seinfield, “her hands are too big, her voice annoys me etc.” So many stupid reasons and that is because I know there is an endless pool to draw from. I really like the work and thanks for helping me see things in another way.

  • http://www.cebuanas.com/ filipino love

    Lucky are those who have the freedom of choice. So no matter how you feel about your situation right now. There are still things to be thank for. So enjoy life with lots of choices! The more choices, the merrier. Hope you find your love already. If not yet, you can consider filipino girls.

  • SuperAwesomeDating

    I read that book too, but the problem is figuring out what you like in another person. I think everyone has a “type” thats right for them. It takes time figuring out what that type is, and once you do, you will realize that most people you come across are not your type. Thats what make dating hard, not neccesarilly choice, but finding your type. Its like trying to find gold, its there somewhere, but once you find it, your all set and you never need to worry again about the search for your type. Just my thoughts.

  • SuperAwesomeDating

    I read that book too, but the problem is figuring out what you like in another person. I think everyone has a “type” thats right for them. It takes time figuring out what that type is, and once you do, you will realize that most people you come across are not your type. Thats what make dating hard, not neccesarilly choice, but finding your type. Its like trying to find gold, its there somewhere, but once you find it, your all set and you never need to worry again about the search for your type. Just my thoughts.

    SuperAwesome (my site)

  • http://www.sixsingles.com/ free dating sites

    nice article

  • http://www.sixsingles.com/ free dating sites

    hii

  • mrdating

    this may be an old comment, but i suppose it still rings true.

    2010, and now dating online is becoming “normal” at last :)

  • royalsneakers

    Rumors have nike air max 1 been circulating for a while now regarding a 2010 release of the nike air max 2010 Air Jordan X (10) “Chicago,” but we have not seen any sort of confirmation in the form of catalog images or words from Jordan Brand representatives. nike air max 95 But today, we are extremely proud to present a nike air max 90 SneakerFiles exclusive confirmation that the Air Jordan nike air max nl X (10) will drop this month as a quickstrike release. Not just any Air Jordan 10, but rather the Chicago colorway with 45—the number Michael Jordan wore when he came back from retirement—on the ankle. This colorway of the AJ 10 is one of the most popular styles ever created, and will surely result in lines outside stores for days and may even cause riots. The Air Jordan X (10) “Chicago 45″ will release at only 150 sneaker stores across the United States with each retailer only receiving 23 pairs. Be sure to check out the additional photos and information after the jump!

  • http://www.luvfree.com Websites for Dating

    I are great examples of how this ‘paradox of choice’ is affecting our generation, and in particular, relationships.