<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Are We? Welcome to the Tribe.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leveragingideas.com/2008/05/11/who-are-we-social-media-identity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leveragingideas.com/2008/05/11/who-are-we-social-media-identity/</link>
	<description>Ideation on economics, media, venture capital and startups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazarus</title>
		<link>http://www.leveragingideas.com/2008/05/11/who-are-we-social-media-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-87786</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 15:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leveragingideas.com/?p=732#comment-87786</guid>
		<description>Sam,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;re correct, access is an important consideration. However, if I remember correctly, the majority of the world&#039;s population do not have access. Not to take anything away from the billions that do, but, there are some very intelligent people without access that have the potential to further enrich our lives via their creations. I guess what I&#039;m trying to get to is, web2.0 applications/services are amazing at connecting us however, the numbers connected can only sit at a local maximum, as opposed to an absolute.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;re also correct in saying it&#039;s all relative. I wonder how many of the 100 richest people in the world actively use these technologies? I suppose this information would be near impossible to obtain, I assume the members of that list wish to guard their online identies/activities etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>You&#39;re correct, access is an important consideration. However, if I remember correctly, the majority of the world&#39;s population do not have access. Not to take anything away from the billions that do, but, there are some very intelligent people without access that have the potential to further enrich our lives via their creations. I guess what I&#39;m trying to get to is, web2.0 applications/services are amazing at connecting us however, the numbers connected can only sit at a local maximum, as opposed to an absolute.</p>
<p>You&#39;re also correct in saying it&#39;s all relative. I wonder how many of the 100 richest people in the world actively use these technologies? I suppose this information would be near impossible to obtain, I assume the members of that list wish to guard their online identies/activities etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazarus</title>
		<link>http://www.leveragingideas.com/2008/05/11/who-are-we-social-media-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-71418</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 11:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leveragingideas.com/?p=732#comment-71418</guid>
		<description>Sam,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;re correct, access is an important consideration. However, if I remember correctly, the majority of the world&#039;s population do not have access. Not to take anything away from the billions that do, but, there are some very intelligent people without access that have the potential to further enrich our lives via their creations. I guess what I&#039;m trying to get to is, web2.0 applications/services are amazing at connecting us however, the numbers connected can only sit at a local maximum, as opposed to an absolute.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;re also correct in saying it&#039;s all relative. I wonder how many of the 100 richest people in the world actively use these technologies? I suppose this information would be near impossible to obtain, I assume the members of that list wish to guard their online identies/activities etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>You&#39;re correct, access is an important consideration. However, if I remember correctly, the majority of the world&#39;s population do not have access. Not to take anything away from the billions that do, but, there are some very intelligent people without access that have the potential to further enrich our lives via their creations. I guess what I&#39;m trying to get to is, web2.0 applications/services are amazing at connecting us however, the numbers connected can only sit at a local maximum, as opposed to an absolute.</p>
<p>You&#39;re also correct in saying it&#39;s all relative. I wonder how many of the 100 richest people in the world actively use these technologies? I suppose this information would be near impossible to obtain, I assume the members of that list wish to guard their online identies/activities etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Huleatt</title>
		<link>http://www.leveragingideas.com/2008/05/11/who-are-we-social-media-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-71417</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Huleatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leveragingideas.com/?p=732#comment-71417</guid>
		<description>Hi there Lazarus,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I agree with you that we are not as &#039;encompassing as we&#039;d like&lt;br&gt;to believe&#039; there are a couple issues here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Access - The third world countries your cousins live in may not&lt;br&gt;have the infrastructure to support high speed internet or access to&lt;br&gt;computers&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Reach - I agree that that technologies such as Twitter are somewhat&lt;br&gt;limited to a set of tech-friendly adopters, but this group continues&lt;br&gt;to grow as young generations embrace new communications styles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Event-Driven Marketing - If you look at real-world applications of&lt;br&gt;a technology such as Twitter you can see that it really does have&lt;br&gt;value in a situation like the earthquake in China. Sadly, it sometime&lt;br&gt;takes a tragedy for a new type of communication to emerge and validate&lt;br&gt;its worth&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4) It&#039;s all relative (no pun) - Just because you don&#039;t see all your&lt;br&gt;friends using these new platforms doesn&#039;t mean they are not being&lt;br&gt;adopted. Twitter and FriendFeed are adding huge numbers of new users&lt;br&gt;daily...it simply takes a long time to permeate through a large enough&lt;br&gt;cross-section of the population that you&#039;d really notice it&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there Lazarus,</p>
<p>While I agree with you that we are not as &#39;encompassing as we&#39;d like<br />to believe&#39; there are a couple issues here:</p>
<p>1) Access &#8211; The third world countries your cousins live in may not<br />have the infrastructure to support high speed internet or access to<br />computers</p>
<p>2) Reach &#8211; I agree that that technologies such as Twitter are somewhat<br />limited to a set of tech-friendly adopters, but this group continues<br />to grow as young generations embrace new communications styles.</p>
<p>3) Event-Driven Marketing &#8211; If you look at real-world applications of<br />a technology such as Twitter you can see that it really does have<br />value in a situation like the earthquake in China. Sadly, it sometime<br />takes a tragedy for a new type of communication to emerge and validate<br />its worth</p>
<p>4) It&#39;s all relative (no pun) &#8211; Just because you don&#39;t see all your<br />friends using these new platforms doesn&#39;t mean they are not being<br />adopted. Twitter and FriendFeed are adding huge numbers of new users<br />daily&#8230;it simply takes a long time to permeate through a large enough<br />cross-section of the population that you&#39;d really notice it</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazarus</title>
		<link>http://www.leveragingideas.com/2008/05/11/who-are-we-social-media-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-71416</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leveragingideas.com/?p=732#comment-71416</guid>
		<description>There is something inherently wrong with these new technologies as a platform/medium for communication. What is the current reach of these technologies?&lt;br&gt;In a supposedely highly connected world, why can I not reach my cousins in an obscure town in a developing country? If you begin to broaden your answer from &quot;they don&#039;t use the technology (they do)&quot;, you&#039;ll begin to understand why they (the technologies) are not as encompassing as we&#039;d like to believe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something inherently wrong with these new technologies as a platform/medium for communication. What is the current reach of these technologies?<br />In a supposedely highly connected world, why can I not reach my cousins in an obscure town in a developing country? If you begin to broaden your answer from &#8220;they don&#39;t use the technology (they do)&#8221;, you&#39;ll begin to understand why they (the technologies) are not as encompassing as we&#39;d like to believe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

