A House Disconnected Cannot Stand

by Sam on October 12, 2008

A House Disconnected Cannot Stand

On September 17th I shared my thoughts on the financial crisis, stating that part of the problem has been the increasing degrees of separation between ourselves, our investments and the process of making money:

The further you are removed you are from a situation or an object, the more difficult it is to monitor and control. Time is not your friend and things can spiral out of control quickly and without your knowledge.

Over the past 10-15 years we’ve come to see computers manipulating huge sums of capital online and financiers using ambiguous instruments like derivatives. It’s okay for hedge funds to use bizarre arbitrage and unsafe leveraged positions because they are ‘smarter’ than we are.

Our disconnection has come back to haunt us again.

It fascinates me that for all its sci-fi underpinnings, it seems an increasing reality that we are moving towards a singularity (see my post here). I believe that our general disconnection, coupled with the growing gaps in wealth, education and technology only reinforce the likelihood of a world-wide cycle of booms, busts and economic chaos in the foreseeable future.

Today the New York Times explores a similar notion in an article called, The Rise of Machines:

Somehow the genius quants — the best and brightest geeks Wall Street firms could buy — fed $1 trillion in subprime mortgage debt into their supercomputers, added some derivatives, massaged the arrangements with computer algorithms and — poof! — created $62 trillion in imaginary wealth. It’s not much of a stretch to imagine that all of that imaginary wealth is locked up somewhere inside the computers, and that we humans, led by the silverback males of the financial world, Ben Bernanke and Henry Paulson, are frantically beseeching the monolith for answers. Or maybe we are lost in space, with Dave the astronaut pleading, “Open the bank vault doors, Hal.â€�

As the current financial crisis spreads (like a computer virus) on the earth’s nervous system (the Internet), it’s worth asking if we have somehow managed to colossally outsmart ourselves using computers. After all, the Wall Street titans loved swaps and derivatives because they were totally unregulated by humans. That left nobody but the machines in charge.

…When Treasury Secretary Paulson (looking very much like a frightened primate) came to Congress seeking an emergency loan, Senator Jon Tester of Montana, a Democrat still living on his family homestead, asked him: “I’m a dirt farmer. Why do we have one week to determine that $700 billion has to be appropriated or this country’s financial system goes down the pipes?â€�

“Well, sir,� Mr. Paulson could well have responded, “the computers have demanded it.�

The question then is not only one of market stabilization, but also of the need to recalibrate on a human capital level. What does it mean for America that a crisis affecting us all is only understood by such a small minority of intellectual elites?

  • http://www.onesherpa.com OneSherpa

    I completely agree with you.
    Having come out of the corporate environment it is no surprise to me that financiers can become completely disconnected with the real businesses they're investing in.
    Makes me laugh when the stockmarket goes down because it only increases the return on investment because companies never pay out their didivdends based on their share price. It's always a function of the profit they've made which never moves around like the share price.
    I'm all for less manipulation in the finance area, creating so called profits from revaluation and thinking it is a real return.

  • http://www.leveragingideas.com Sam Huleatt

    Yes, it's to some extent an agency problem. The financiers are most interested in personal returns than understanding how they are investing their funds. It's always amazed me that friends with absolutely no background in finance end up on trading floors and working as brokers/private wealth managers for UBS and the like

  • http://realtaiji.com Steven

    It means that they (those intellectual elites) are lying, and that we should take-care of them. Really, they are out of hand. I will not pay back their debt. No way. Neither will my boy, so buck up everyone – I'm out. I owe no one.

  • http://realtaiji.com Steven

    It means that they (those intellectual elites) are lying, and that we should take-care of them. Really, they are out of hand. I will not pay back their debt. No way. Neither will my boy, so buck up everyone – I'm out. I owe no one.

  • http://realtaiji.com Steven

    It means that they (those intellectual elites) are lying, and that we should take-care of them. Really, they are out of hand. I will not pay back their debt. No way. Neither will my boy, so buck up everyone – I'm out. I owe no one.

  • royalsneakers

    Rumors have been circulating for a while nike air max 1 now regarding a 2010 release of the Air Jordan X (10) “Chicago,” but we have not seen any sort of confirmation in nike air max 2010 the form of catalog images or words from nike air max 95 Jordan Brand representatives. But today, we are extremely proud to present a SneakerFiles nike air max 90 exclusive confirmation that the Air Jordan X (10) will drop this month as a quickstrike release. Not just any Air Jordan 10, but rather the nike air max nl Chicago colorway with 45—the number Michael Jordan wore when he came back from retirement—on the ankle. This colorway of the AJ 10 is one of the most popular styles ever created, and will surely result in lines outside stores for days and may even cause riots. The Air Jordan X (10) “Chicago 45″ will release at only 150 sneaker stores across the United States with each retailer only receiving 23 pairs. Be sure to check out the additional photos and information after the jump!